The Chamberlain Files | Homepage
Deal or no deal, professionally speaking?

Deal or no deal, professionally speaking?

🕔06.Jun 2018

The potential for a ‘Sector Deal’ for the professional services sector and the challenges of doing business in the post-Brexit era are highlighted by Hilary Smyth-Allen, Executive Director of BPS Birmingham, the voice for the business, professional and financial services sector in Greater Birmingham. 

The words ‘National Sector Deal’ might not mean very much to many working within the professional services sector in the West Midlands, but BPS Birmingham understands that the draft structure of a Deal for this important sector is close to being agreed.

When the Government published its Industrial Strategy White Paper late last year, it outlined many ideas and challenges that would be backed with resources to increase UK productivity – and by extension – quality of life.

Sector Deals are one of the ways in which these resources can be allocated, providing a case can be made that directly links the ‘asks’ to clear productivity improvements. In the Government’s words, Sector Deals are “partnerships between Government and industry on sector-specific issues and create significant opportunities to boost productivity, employment, innovation and skills”. [1]

Services are recognised as being a very significant part of the UK economy and whilst not specifically referred to in the White Paper, the door was officially opened for a professional services Sector Deal.

In fact, reference is made to the longstanding collaborative partnership with professional and business services (rather unhelpfully called the PBS sector – most of us in the West Midlands tend to use BPS/BPFS acronyms).[2] This probably comes from the PBSC, which is the Professional and Business Services Council; a group of business leaders representing professional services interests in direct communication with government, with BEIS as the lead department and one of its ministers as one of the Council’s co-chairs.[3]

At a Managing Partners Forum[4] meeting in London earlier this week, we learnt about the priorities of the PBSC, but more significantly the thinking underpinning a draft PBS Sector Deal. For Greater Birmingham and the wider West Midlands region, where the BPFS/PBS sector is the largest contributor to the regional economy with the fastest anticipated growth over the next decade, the contents of such a deal should hold great interest.

The first thing to understand is that whilst it sounds like a unified group of like-minded souls, the PBS sector and its council is a “broad church,”. As BPS Birmingham is all too aware from its recent research with City-REDI for the WMCA Productivity and Skills Commission, the sub-sectors that group together under this heading include everything you might expect such as financial services, accountancy and law to real estate sub-sectors and construction consultancies to advertising (you might categorise as creative industries) and support services (call centres, out-sourced back office functions and the like).

This is the grouping that arises from standard industry classifications and the challenge facing the PBSC is to negotiate a deal with Government that can provide support across all businesses that fall within the sector definition.

Where we understand them to have arrived is a draft Deal that focuses on ‘talent’ as the common, cross-cutting theme that poses consistent barriers to productivity. Within this, we further understand that there are four areas or sub-themes and resulting areas of ‘asks’, which are broadly summarised as:

  • Getting talent into the UK to be able to work within the sector
  • Being able to ‘export’ talent (for want of a better phrase); this is about ensuring a mobility of output and services around the globe through movement of staff
  • Social inclusion and access to the professions as a means of increasing the talent pool from which employees of the future come, increasing resilience of businesses etc.
  • Skills for a 100-year life ie. recognising that life expectancy is growing and life-long learning is fundamental to meeting future skills needs taking a longer term view than simply the point at which people enter the firms.

With regards to the first point, we understand  this builds off the substantial piece of work by our good friends at The City UK, in partnership with EY, in relation to a more fit-for-purpose immigration system for financial and associated professional services.[5]

Most of the discussion has centred on the understanding and importance of mutual access in the Brexit negotiations. The critical point is recognition of the regulators of UK-based services in Europe and further afield that enable the export of services currently enjoyed and on which this sector’s firms rely.

Be it The Law Society, ACCA, ICAEW, RIBA, RICS – to name only a handful of the professional bodies – the importance of their portability abroad cannot be underestimated. Nor can it be taken for granted that it will be in place on the ‘other side’ of Brexit. If there is one call to action, business representation on this point is it.

To put into context,  economists talk in terms of services now making up approximately 80% of the economy. This isn’t just professional services, but the key point is that the focus of negotiations to date with the EU is almost – if not entirely – focussed on goods and customs in terms of physical borders.

People more informed than me point out that this is likely to be due to the balance of trade and that the EU stands to lose more from not resolving the movement of goods, whereas services are more in our economic interests. No doubt there is more to it than this simplistic narrative, but either way the stark reality is that negotiations are dragging out such that the needs of service industries are not yet on the agenda.

There is clear and genuine concern that the window of opportunity for these discussions is rapidly disappearing and/or that much may have been given away already, weakening the negotiating position when the time comes. In this scenario, service-based businesses and the skilled people within them can leave relatively readily and not necessarily for commonly cited European competitors such as Frankfurt or Hamburg, but also New York, Singapore and further East.

The message seems to be one of understanding and “we’re trying”, but that services businesses need to be considering other ways of working should the current freedoms no longer exist.

Potentially depressing stuff, but it does further emphasise the need to be able to ‘grow our own’ talent and that if anyone can respond to this challenge, the West Midlands has many of the raw ingredients required to do so with its super-diverse and youthful population. More will come out about this and the need for ‘good growth’ as the output of the deep-dive for the BPS sector from WMCA is published (anticipated early July around the timing of anticipated regional skills deals announcements).

Diving deep into the professional sector to drive productivity

Back to the National Sector Deal; hopefully we will soon learn whether the broad structure of the draft has been accepted. Assuming it has, it will still take around 18 months before there are any concrete announcements regarding content.

Other departments need to come on board to be able to deliver some of the ‘asks’ eg. the Home Office in respect of immigration. BEIS has made some noises about Sector Deal pilots that bring in place-based economies so that this isn’t an entirely London driven agenda.

As you finish reading, if the urge comes feel free to write a letter to Greg Clark, the Business Secretary, his ministers and to your local MP about the importance of professional industry regulators. It could be a very valuable hour well spent.[6]

Main Pic: West Midlands Mayor Andy Street leading a Business Walk at last year’s Professional Services Week. Organised by BPS Birmingham, the next one runs 25th – 29th June. 

[1] “Industrial Strategy: Building a Britain fit for the future” HM Government, 27th November 2017. Accessible online at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/664563/industrial-strategy-white-paper-web-ready-version.pdf [Last accessed 4th June 2018]

[2] As per footnote 1.

[3] More about the BEIS Professional & Business Services Council can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/bis-professional-and-business-services-sector-team [Last accessed 4th June 2018]

[4] More about our friends the Managing Partners Forum can be found here: http://www.mpfglobal.com [Last accessed 5th June 2018]

[5] More about The City UK and their work on immigration system to support Financial and associated services can be found here: https://www.thecityuk.com/news/miles-celic-speech-on-immigration-at-ey/ [Last accessed 5th June 2018]; full report: https://www.thecityuk.com/research/the-uks-future-immigration-system-and-access-to-talent/ 

[6] Details on  relevant Ministers/ Parliamentary Undersecretaries at BEIS include: Richard Harrington MP (https://www.gov.uk/government/people/richard-harrington) and Rt Hon Lord Henley (https://www.gov.uk/government/people/lord-henley)

Similar Articles

Farewell Deadly Doug

Farewell Deadly Doug 0

So, farewell Deadly Doug. I doubt professional football will see his like again, writes Andy

Review: investment points to success, but skills challenge remains

Review: investment points to success, but skills challenge remains 0

Current investment in infrastructure and technology will underpin future economic success in Birmingham, according to

Stop bidding, begging & bowing to Treasury – but how?

Stop bidding, begging & bowing to Treasury – but how? 0

One October long ago, shortly before England won the World Cup, my first final-year undergraduate

HS2 reveals design vision for new stations

HS2 reveals design vision for new stations 0

HS2 is today releasing images of of its two brand new stations in Birmingham and

‘Illegal budgets’ – I’m no Corbynista, but this was media mischief

‘Illegal budgets’ – I’m no Corbynista, but this was media mischief

I wasn’t going to bother.  I mean, if you get into a state every time

About Author

Chamberlain Files Weekly

Don't miss a thing! Sign up for our free weekly summary of the Chamberlain Files from RJF Public Affairs.
* = required field

powered by MailChimp!

Our latest tweets

Published by

Published by

.

Our community