The Chamberlain Files | Homepage
Birmingham businesses warn council congestion charge vision will damage city centre economy

Birmingham businesses warn council congestion charge vision will damage city centre economy

🕔13.Mar 2014

On the day that West Midlands’ council leaders showcased a £2 billion package of rail, tram and rapid transit schemes at MIPIM, a Birmingham survey demonstrated continuing public resistance to forcing private cars off the road by imposing charges on drivers.

Local authority representatives gathered at the annual property fair in Cannes to proudly unveil proposals for the Local Connectivity Package, based on feeding fast and modern methods of public transport into the HS2 high speed rail line.

Meanwhile, Birmingham city council released details of a consultation into its own Mobility Action Plan (BMAP), which sets out plans for improved tram and bus services and discusses how to cut congestion on city centre roads.

A clear message comes through from the consultation, according to consultants WSP. And that is a firm belief that public transport must be radically improved before any form of congestion charging, workplace parking charging or city tax is introduced.

It’s exactly the same conclusion that was reached in the early 2000s, the last occasion that the city council wrestled with the idea of encouraging a switch to public transport by charging motorists more to drive into central Birmingham.

The response to BMAP shows that both members of the public and stakeholder groups are wary of imposing a ‘stick’ in the form of charges before ‘carrots’ in the form of improved public transport are available.

Businesses in particular, in the shape of the Chamber of Commerce, fear that any attempt by Birmingham to ‘go it alone’ in the West Midlands by levying a congestion charge would severely damage competitiveness and drive firms away.

SWP’s analysis of the consultation states: “While stakeholders appreciate that there is a significant funding gap which could be plugged by the introduction of a charging mechanism (which at the same time would help deliver behavioural change), and a number believe that motorists should contribute towards the funding of the new transport infrastructure, there is a strong feeling that it would not be appropriate to introduce charges until the new transport infrastructure is established.

“There are many concerns that the introduction of any sort of charging mechanism in Birmingham would impact on the economic competitiveness of the city. There are also concerns that any measures to discourage car-based traffic from high streets and the city centre may also impact on the economic viability of these centres.

As expected, there is strong support for better public transport. But there is little agreement on the best way to move forward.

Most respondents to the consultation agreed on the need to invest in mass transit of some sort, but there was no overall consensus on whether this should be delivered solely by Metro, a bus based Sprint system or a combination of the two.

The analysis continues: “Though there is an acceptance that in order to achieve the BMAP vision, Birmingham’s citizens, businesses and visitors to the city are going to have to change their travel behaviour, there is a reluctance to introduce punitive measures to realise this transformation.

“Whilst some accept there may be a need for measures to dissuade car use at a later date, there is definite agreement that they should not be introduced until the infrastructure, quality and service improvements are in place.

If penalties of any sort are to be introduced further down the line, there is a strong feeling that they should be based on the reallocation of road space, making it harder to access certain destinations by private car, rather than fiscal. There is clear agreement that above all, in order to achieve modal shift, BMAP needs to demonstrate that sustainable travel can be cheaper, quicker and more convenient than using the car.”

Undaunted by the consultation response, cabinet member Tahir Ali said: “There is real support for the vision we have set out, from both the public and from our partners.

“They want to see a transport policy that moves people and goods around the city quickly and reliably, including a mass-transit network, making the city accessible to everyone, particularly those with mobility problems.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Similar Articles

Game: I don’t live in a 90% (or 100%) Labour city

Game: I don’t live in a 90% (or 100%) Labour city 0

Well, last week certainly had its excitements, didn’t it?  First, that penalty shoot-out business.  Then

West Midlands cities must tackle ‘digital divides’ to compete

West Midlands cities must tackle ‘digital divides’ to compete 0

Many UK cities are falling behind global counterparts in capitalising on the social and economic

You know the Meriden Gap – well, here’s the West Midlands Goodwill Gap

You know the Meriden Gap – well, here’s the West Midlands Goodwill Gap 0

I see in last week’s Solihull Observer that there’s a campaign to have the Meriden

Council: ‘time is running out,’ but when?

Council: ‘time is running out,’ but when?

"Time is running out and we need to see real progress." So says John Crabtree OBE,

Council: this time we’re serious

Council: this time we’re serious

Birmingham City Council today publishes an Improvement 'Stocktake Report' outlining the current position relating to

About Author

Chamberlain Files Weekly

Don't miss a thing! Sign up for our free weekly summary of the Chamberlain Files from RJF Public Affairs.
* = required field

powered by MailChimp!

Our latest tweets

Published by

Published by


Our community